Wed 27 Jun 2012
Putting my expertise where my mouth is
Posted by Ed under Academia, Adaptation, Africa, Climate Change, development, environment, Food Security, Higher Education, research, sustainable development
[2] Comments
OK folks, yesterday I pointed to my friend Keith Bratton’s kickstarter effort to fund a photodocumentary study of the impacts of climate change on life in Ghana’s Central Region. Please go to the page and check it out – Keith is a great photographer, and will produce really stunning stuff (some of which you can have, for a very low pledge!). He’s crawling toward what he needs for the project, so all donations are important.
But to up the ante, I want to point out another “reward” option that Keith is now putting up. The case he wants to document is a fantastic example of the complex challenge that climate change presents to the achievement of development goals – it raises issues of cross-sectoral work, the connections between people and the natural world, and how climate change creates unexpected challenges that, if unaddressed, can compromise the things you are focusing on. It is, in short, a perfect case from which we can learn about why we must integrate climate sensitivity into development work, and the ways in which such sensitivity makes us “think differently” about development.
To whet your appetite, an example from my own work in Ghana that I talk about in my public speaking on the book: in 2005, I suddenly noticed that there were flocks of toucans flying around the villages in which I had been working from some 8 years. I had never seen toucans before, and their sudden presence puzzled me. It took me a while to piece together what was going on – you see, the Gulf of Guinea large marine ecosystem has been collapsing due to an intersection of overfishing (itself driven by a combination of local overfishing to feed a growing population, and the presence of large international trawlers overfishing the territorial waters of Ghana and other countries, largely with impunity) and climate change (which has changed the upwellings of cold water in July-September and December such that there are fewer fish riding those upwellings into the local fisheries). With less fish to eat, communities in the coastal hinterland had started hunting aggressively, wiping out most terrestrial animals in the process – along with them, rodents…who must have eaten toucan eggs. Hence the explosion of toucans, who are likely wiping out some other species they like to eat, etc., etc.. The toucan is just a manifestation of a complex ecological change taking place along the coast of the Gulf of Guinea that is poorly understood, but presenting real challenges for people’s food security and incomes. Achieving development goals in this region, then, requires understanding climate change and its impacts, as well as the complex and seemingly-distant outcomes of these impacts.
That is a remarkably simplified version of what I see happening in Ghana – and it can be told more eloquently, and with more grounding in the human experience of these changes, in the work Keith proposes. So, beyond seeing him work toward publishing this important story, I have suggested to him that he offer, at the $1000 pledge level, to put together a training module for your organization, using his pictures and findings, to help train your people up on the importance of climate change to development, and on how to think about climate change in the context of development. Further, because I believe in Keith’s project but lack the wherewithal to back it out of my own pocket, I have offered to work with Keith to build this module should anyone order it. So, in return for supporting Keith’s work, you get his photos and experiences, as well as my expertise – 14 years in university classrooms, over two years of living in villages in sub-Saharan Africa, lots of refereed publications addressing the climate change/development connection, and work on the donor side examining the climate change/development connection – all wrapped up in a training module that you can plug in to your own training program.
For those of you outside the development implementation world, this might seem like an insanely high price – but everyone in that world knows that this is a steal. Were I a training consultant, I would be charging an order of magnitude more for such a service, at least. And my illustrations would not be as nice as what you will get from Keith. Again, Keith will produce the module, and I will help him do it – but I will not be paid to do this. I have no financial stake in this project at all. This is my in-kind backing of what I think is a significant project. So if your organization needs the training, here is a great opportunity.

Regarding the “explosion of toucans,” and the cascade of events you linked as a manifestation of a complex ecological change taking place along the coast of the Gulf of Guinea, it seems plausible, to be sure. But I would prefer to see citations to literature documenting such trends, as it comes across as just a bit too glib. Ironically, your scenario is drawn from your tendency (ability) to look for the bigger picture, and if one were to get lost in the trees, the broader “sea to forest” web of linkages would be overlooked. It’s a dilemma. But surely there is some peer-reviewed journal documentation on this particular set of relationships? CI, WCS, WWF?
So the question remains, is a blog the “right” medium for an academic dedicated to objective truth?
Hi Walter – thanks for the comment! There is a literature, very thin, on the onshore ecological impacts. I have a reference in the book (can’t find it now, as I am in an airport) to an article in Science that is the only really academic piece looking at how the depletion of the fishery is hitting onshore species. This did not include toucans – obviously you are correct, we’d need to get in and make sure my interpretation is correct (though I hear from the folks in the villages I work with that the rodent population is indeed way down). I’m not sure about the gray lit – I am pushing Keith to dig as much as he can on this, and see what he turns up.
Your last question is a great one – the blog is one medium for discussion, and certainly not the same sort of medium as an academic journal (which, of course, has much higher standards). The issue I wrestle with, which I think you allude to here, is how to blog credibly without trying to make the blog seem as rigorous as a journal article (which it is not), but at the same time be interesting to a wider audience without devaluing the academic research I conduct. I continue to wrestle with this…
As for objective truth, I am too much of a social theorist to really believe in that – I am an ontological agnostic. I know there is a real world out there, but I will never apprehend it outside of my own social filters (nor will anyone else) – so I prefer to focus on that which really drives behavior, which is perception. This is not to say that we can’t verify the toucan impact of the Gulf of Guinea collapse, but that such verification doesn’t strike me as truth as much as provisional reinforcement of our very partial understanding of enormously complex intersecting biophysical systems…(that was a terribly un-bloglike sentence, no?).